No matter which strategy is used, the goal of MTSS behavioral interventions is to connect students to the school and their own education. One of the most common strategies is Check-In Check-Out (CICO), where students meet with a mentor at the beginning and end of every day to set goals, receive points from teachers for meeting goals, and earn rewards based on their points.
While it’s an effective intervention, experts from the edLeader Panel, “Designing a Menu of Behavior Intervention Options: Beyond Check-In Check-Out” believe schools should have an array of choices—both to make the strongest connection with the student and to ensure that the intervention is addressing the behaviors.
First, in order to have successful interventions at Tiers 2 and 3, schools must have solid Tier 1 practices. In other words, there are clear expectations for student behavior, and all school staff are intentionally working toward a positive school environment. Without this, not only are Tier 2 and 3 interventions not possible, but the overall school climate will suffer.
Second, the panelists differentiated between programs and strategies. While there are many MTSS programs sold to districts, they emphasized that with ongoing, effective training, strategies could often be implemented without having to purchase a proprietary system.
Next, they highlighted important aspects of intervention programs. These are proven, evidence-based actions for addressing behavior issues, and include:
It takes a lot of energy to engage in a new behavior, so an essential element is ongoing feedback and positive reinforcement. Also, school intervention staff need to know if the student has a skill in their repertoire or if they are choosing not to use it, because that would change how to approach an issue.
Finally, before implementing any behavior strategies, the intervention team must consider three key elements of the plan:
According to the panelists, fidelity is often where strategies break down. Teams need to consistently report how the student is accessing the intervention, how long they are doing it, and how well they are responding. It’s not a “gotcha” moment, but instead asking: Are students coming into contact with the full dosage and quality of what you have designed for them? Otherwise, a common problem is that staff may say an intervention isn’t working when, in reality, it hasn’t been implemented as it should be.
Related Resource: MTSS Implementation Fidelity Reference Guide
There are also highly structured intensive programs that are typically delivered over three to five weeks. These paid programs often have a manual and bring together several strategies to aid a student.
For any successful intervention, the key is to have it ready to go before a student needs it. You need a dedicated person who has time to make sure the programs are running correctly, knows how the intervention will be put in place, and understands what supports are needed for the teachers, students, and families. Once a student is identified as needing an intervention, it should happen as quickly as possible.
You can find the original version of this article on EdWeb, available here.